Sabbath Simplicity: How To Eliminate The Sabbath Controversy

The older I get, the more I appreciate simplicity.

As a teenager, I remember getting excited if a new ice cream flavour showed up on the horizon.

Then, there were potato chips.

Potato chips in the basic flavour were fabulous, but then we learned there was a sour cream & onion flavour, barbecue, hot ‘n spicy and a host of other options. Everything changed. Suddenly, the humble  potato chip could not be enjoyed on its own merit. It became a mere conveyor of seasonings and spices.

Human beings have a knack for complicating things, and unnecessary complexity gives rise to controversy, because we suddenly have this desire to have others like our ‘flavour preferences’.

We can argue from now until the cows come home, but ‘a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still’. The herd will be looming large on the horizon when it dawns on you that you had wanted to clean the barn but wasted all your time on argument that proved to be an exercise in futility.

The Gospel is simple. It has always been. It will always be. This is the very thing I appreciate about it. Sprinkle flavourings all you want, but the heart of the gospel defies any attempt to confuse the issue.

There is one particular command that many have come to view as problematic. It has to do with a command to keep the seventh day holy.

Is that singular command – surrounded by nine others – still valid and binding?

Since Pope Francis is making waves across the globe, maybe the Catechism he uses will be more acceptable to those who question the clarity of Scripture. Here is an excerpt from the Catholic catechism in the Vatican’s archives:

“2169 In speaking of the sabbath Scripture recalls creation: “For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and hallowed it.”93
2170 Scripture also reveals in the Lord’s day a memorial of Israel’s liberation from bondage in Egypt: “You shall remember that you were a servant in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God brought you out thence with mighty hand and outstretched arm; therefore the LORD your God commanded you to keep the sabbath day.”94
2171 God entrusted the sabbath to Israel to keep as a sign of the irrevocable covenant.95 The sabbath is for the Lord, holy and set apart for the praise of God, his work of creation, and his saving actions on behalf of Israel.
2172 God’s action is the model for human action. If God “rested and was refreshed” on the seventh day, man too ought to “rest” and should let others, especially the poor, “be refreshed.”96The sabbath brings everyday work to a halt and provides a respite. It is a day of protest against the servitude of work and the worship of money…” [emphasis mine]

The highlighted section forms part of the reason that I find the controversy surrounding this matter befuddling.

Anyone who has ever signed a contract knows what irrevocable means… You pause, pen in mid-air, to assess all the pros and cons before signing, because you know there is no turning back once your signature has been affixed. The terms are unchangeable for the duration of the contract. When the contract is rooted in an economy where not one jot nor tittle can shift until all be fulfilled … well, let’s just say the time frame falls outside the realm of mortal comprehension.

Whatever flavour profiles spiritual Israel chooses to add in an effort to diversify its offerings, there can be no tampering with the base flavour. The Decalogue is irrevocable.

It is also surprisingly simple to find out which day is referred to as the seventh since it comes just before Resurrection Sunday – when all Christ-followers “rested according to the commandment.”

No muss. No fuss.

While I am here, I will also tell you how to rid the world of this pesky Sabbath controversy:

Find Biblical proof that God authorised a change.

Jehovah God went to so much trouble to verbally proclaim the Decalogue from Sinai, almost sending his chosen people into apoplectic shock. Surely, if He decided to change His previously-irrevocable Law, He would have thought to give irrefutable evidence to that effect.

It just makes sense.

Easy-peasy.

*Image Source: Pixabay (CC0 Public Domain)

One Comment Add yours

  1. thandilocks says:

    Amen.

Your comments have value. Please share your thoughts below.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.